- conviction for failing to report serious offense did not violate appellant’s Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination where appellant could have reported the offense immediately without incurring criminal liability
- plea to misprision of a serious offense was provident where appellant took affirmative steps to conceal the identity of the offender after commission of the offense; both affirmative acts of concealing the identity of a perpetrator and concealing the offense itself are equally criminally culpable
CAAF Opinion Digest · III.A.95 · Crimes Pre-2019 offenses
Article 134 - Misprision of Serious Offense
Offenses committed before 1 January 2019 (pre-2016 amendment) — opinions from the 1999 through 2020 Terms of Court.
1 digested opinion, 1999–1999 Terms
1999
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · digest page IIIA95 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).