- breaking restriction is a minor offense endorsed by the President which carries a maximum sentence of confinement for one month and forfeiture of two-thirds pay per month for one month
- the distinction between an Article 90 disobedience of an order offense and an Article 134 breaking restriction offense does not require a Hartman (69 MJ 467 (CAAF 2011)) discussion at the plea inquiry where a military judge must explain to an accused during the guilty plea inquiry the difference between conduct that was constitutionally protected and conduct that could be legitimately punished
CAAF Opinion Digest · III.A.102 · Crimes Pre-2019 offenses
Article 134 – Restriction, Breaking
Offenses committed before 1 January 2019 (pre-2016 amendment) — opinions from the 1999 through 2020 Terms of Court.
1 digested opinion, 2014–2014 Terms
2014 (September Term)
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · digest page IIIA102 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).