- the elements of Article 110, UCMJ, improper hazarding of vessel, are (1) that a vessel of the armed forces was hazarded in a certain manner; and (2) that the accused by certain acts or omissions, willfully and wrongfully, or negligently, caused or suffered the vessel to be hazarded; willfully hazarding a vessel is a non-mandatory capital offense, punishable by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct; negligently hazarding a vessel is a lesser-included, noncapital offense, punishable by dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 2 years
CAAF Opinion Digest · III.A.34 · Crimes Pre-2019 offenses
Article 110 - Improper Hazarding of Vessel
Offenses committed before 1 January 2019 (pre-2016 amendment) — opinions from the 1999 through 2020 Terms of Court.
1 digested opinion, 2004–2004 Terms
2004
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · digest page IIIA34 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).