Summary of changes
R.C.M. 914B — Use of remote testimony
The text as it stood in the last Manual for Courts-Martial edition beside the current text, provision by provision, with every recorded amendment and the authority behind it — the whole R.C.M. in one view.
0 amended
0 added
0 removed
3 unchanged
No changes recorded for this R.C.M. —
its text is the same as the last Manual for Courts-Martial edition.
Showing every provision.
Provisions
914B(a)
unchanged
Original text
General procedures.
The military judge shall determine the procedures used to take testimony via remote means. At a minimum, all parties shall be able to hear each other, those in attendance at the remote site shall be identified, and the accused shall be permitted private, contemporaneous communication with his counsel.
Current text
General procedures.
The military judge shall determine the procedures used to take testimony via remote means. At a minimum, all parties shall be able to hear each other, those in attendance at the remote site shall be identified, and the accused shall be permitted private, contemporaneous communication with his counsel.
914B(b)
unchanged
Original text
Definition.
As used in this rule, testimony via “remote means” includes, but is not limited to, testimony by video teleconference, closed circuit television, telephone, or similar technology.
Current text
Definition.
As used in this rule, testimony via “remote means” includes, but is not limited to, testimony by video teleconference, closed circuit television, telephone, or similar technology.
914B(b)|D
unchanged
Original text
This rule applies for all witness testimony other than child witness testimony specifically covered by Mil. R. Evid. 611(d) and R.C.M. 914A. When utilizing testimony via remote means, military justice practitioners are encouraged to consult the procedure used in In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation , 129 F.R.D. 424 (D.P.R. 1989), and to read United States v. Gigante , 166 F.3d 75 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1114 (2000).
Current text
This rule applies for all witness testimony other than child witness testimony specifically covered by Mil. R. Evid. 611(d) and R.C.M. 914A. When utilizing testimony via remote means, military justice practitioners are encouraged to consult the procedure used in In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation , 129 F.R.D. 424 (D.P.R. 1989), and to read United States v. Gigante , 166 F.3d 75 (2d Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1114 (2000).
“Original text” is the state captured the first time a provision was edited under change tracking — i.e. the text as published in the last Manual for Courts-Martial edition. Provisions edited without being “marked as changed” (typos, formatting) are not recorded here; see the recent revisions feed and the site-wide changes log.