Before trial, trial counsel may, and shall upon request of defense counsel, submit to each member written questions requesting the following information:

Date of birth;

Sex;

Race;

Marital status and sex, age, and number of dependents;

Home of record;

Civilian and military education, including, when available, major areas of study, name of school or institution, years of education, and degrees received;

Current unit to which assigned;

Past duty assignments;

Awards and decorations received;

Date of rank; and

Whether the member has acted as accuser, counsel, preliminary hearing officer, investigating officer, convening authority, or legal officer or staff judge advocate for the convening authority in the case, or has forwarded the charges with a recommendation as to disposition. Additional information may be requested with the approval of the military judge. Each member’s responses to the questions shall be written and signed by the member. For purposes of this rule, the term “members” includes any alternate members.

Using questionnaires before trial may expedite voir dire and may permit more informed exercise of challenges. If the questionnaire is marked or admitted as an exhibit at the court-martial it must be attached to or included in the record of trial. See R.C.M. 1112(b)(6).

A copy of any written materials considered by the convening authority in selecting the members detailed to the court-martial shall be provided to any party upon request, except that such materials pertaining solely to persons who were not selected for detail as members need not be provided unless the military judge, for good cause, so directs.

Before the examination of members under subsection (d) of this rule begins, or at the next session after a party discovered or could have discovered by the exercise of diligence, the grounds therefor, whichever is earlier, that party may move to stay the proceedings on the ground that members were selected improperly.

See R.C.M. 502(a) and 503(a) concerning selection of members. Members are also improperly selected when, for example, a certain group or class is arbitrarily excluded from consideration as members.

Upon a motion under paragraph (b)(1) of this rule containing an offer of proof of matters which, if true, would constitute improper selection of members, the moving party shall be entitled to present evidence, including any written materials considered by the convening authority in selecting the members. Any other party may also present evidence on the matter. If the military judge determines that the members have been selected improperly, the military judge shall stay any proceedings requiring the presence of members until members are properly selected.

Failure to make a timely motion under this subsection shall forfeit the improper selection unless it constitutes a violation of R.C.M. 501(a), 502(a)(1), or 503(a)(2).

Trial counsel shall state any ground for challenge for cause against any member of which trial counsel is aware.

The military judge may permit the parties to conduct examination of members or may personally conduct examination. In the latter event the military judge shall permit the parties to supplement the examination by such further inquiry as the military judge deems proper or the military judge shall submit to the members such additional questions by the parties as the military judge deems proper. A member may be questioned outside the presence of other members when the military judge so directs.

Examination of the members is called “voir dire.” If the members have not already been placed under oath for the purpose of voir dire ( see R.C.M. 807(b)(2) Discussion (B)), they should be sworn before they are questioned. The opportunity for voir dire should be used to obtain information for the intelligent exercise of challenges; counsel should not purposely use voir dire to present factual matter which will not be admissible or to argue the case. The nature and scope of the examination of members is within the discretion of the military judge. Members may be questioned individually or collectively. Ordinarily, the military judge should permit counsel to personally question the members. Trial counsel ordinarily conducts an inquiry before the defense. Whether trial counsel will question all the members before the defense begins or whether some other procedure will be followed depends on the circumstances. For example, when members are questioned individually outside the presence of other members, each party would ordinarily complete questioning that member before another member is questioned. The military judge and each party may conduct additional questioning, after initial questioning by a party, as necessary. Ordinarily the members should be asked whether they are aware of any ground for challenge against them. This may expedite further questioning. The members should be cautioned, however, not to disclose information in the presence of other members which might disqualify them.

Any party may present evidence relating to whether grounds for challenge exist against a member.

A member shall be excused for cause whenever it appears that the member:

Is not competent to serve as a member under Article 25(a), (b), or (c);

Has not been properly detailed as a member of the court-martial;

Is an accuser as to any offense charged;

Will be a witness in the court-martial;

Has acted as counsel for any party as to any offense charged;

Has been a preliminary hearing officer as to any offense charged;

Has acted in the same case as convening authority or as the legal officer or staff judge advocate to the convening authority;

Will act in the same case as reviewing authority or as the legal officer or staff judge advocate to the reviewing authority;

Has forwarded charges in the case with a personal recommendation as to disposition;

Upon a rehearing or new or other trial of the case, was a member of the court-martial which heard the case before;

Is junior to the accused in grade or rank, unless it is established that this could not be avoided;

Is in arrest or confinement;

Has formed or expressed a definite opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused as to any offense charged;

Should not sit as a member in the interest of having the court-martial free from substantial doubt as to legality, fairness, and impartiality.

Examples of matters which may be grounds for challenge are that the member: has a direct personal interest in the result of the trial; is closely related to the accused, a counsel, or a witness in the case; has participated as a member or counsel in the trial of a closely related case; has a decidedly friendly or hostile attitude toward a party; or has an inelastic opinion concerning an appropriate sentence for the offenses charged.

Upon completion of any examination under subsection (d) of this rule and the presentation of evidence, if any, on the matter, each party shall state any challenges for cause it elects to make.

A challenge for cause may be made at any other time during trial when it becomes apparent that a ground for challenge may exist. Such examination of the member and presentation of evidence as may be necessary may be made in order to resolve the matter.

Each party shall be permitted to make challenges outside the presence of the members. The party making a challenge shall state the grounds for it. Ordinarily trial counsel shall enter any challenges for cause before defense counsel. The military judge shall rule finally on each challenge. The burden of establishing that grounds for a challenge exist is upon the party making the challenge. A member successfully challenged shall be excused.

The grounds for challenge in subparagraph (f)(1)(A) of this rule may not be waived. Notwithstanding the absence of a challenge or waiver of a challenge by the parties, the military judge may, in the interest of justice, excuse a member against whom a challenge for cause would lie. When a challenge for cause has been denied, the successful use of a peremptory challenge by either party, excusing the challenged member from further participation in the court-martial, shall preclude further consideration of the challenge of that excused member upon later review. Further, failure by the challenging party to exercise a peremptory challenge against any member shall constitute waiver of further consideration of the challenge upon later review.

See Mil. R. Evid. 606 regarding when a member may be a witness. Random numbers are assigned to the members in order to organize and identify the members to be impaneled under R.C.M. 912A.

Each party may challenge one member peremptorily. Any member so challenged shall be excused. No party may be required to exercise a peremptory challenge before the examination of members and determination of any challenges for cause have been completed. Ordinarily, trial counsel shall enter any peremptory challenge before the defense. No member may be impaneled without being subject to peremptory challenge.

If members not previously subject to peremptory challenge are required, the procedures in R.C.M. 912(g)(1) shall be followed with respect to such members.

This rule allows for each party to exercise an additional preemptory challenge against a detailed member whose presence is directed in accordance with R.C.M. 912A, after examination and challenges for cause. See Article 41(c). If a military judge orders the presence of additional detailed members for examination in accordance with R.C.M. 911, those additional detailed members must be subject to a peremptory challenge prior to impanelment. If the convening authority details additional members, those additional detailed members must be subject to a peremptory challenge prior to impanelment. Generally, no reason is necessary for a peremptory challenge. But see Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 (1986); United States v. Tulloch , 47 M.J. 283 (C.A.A.F. 1997); United States v. Curtis , 33 M.J. 101 (C.M.A. 1991), cert. denied , 502 U.S. 1097 (1992); United States v. Moore , 28 M.J. 366 (C.M.A. 1989); United States v. Santiago-Davilla , 26 M.J. 380 (C.M.A. 1988).

Failure to exercise a peremptory challenge when properly called upon to do so shall waive the right to make such a challenge. The military judge may, for good cause shown, grant relief from the waiver, but a peremptory challenge may not be made after the presentation of evidence before the members has begun. However, nothing in this subsection shall bar the exercise of a peremptory challenge against a member newly detailed under R.C.M. 505(c)(2)(B), even if presentation of evidence on the merits has begun.

When the membership of the court-martial has been reduced below the number of members required under R.C.M. 501(a), as applicable, or, when enlisted members have been requested and the fraction of enlisted members has been reduced below one-third, the proceedings should be adjourned and the convening authority notified so that new members may be detailed. See R.C.M. 505. See also R.C.M. 805(d) concerning other procedures when new members are detailed.

For purposes of this rule, “witness” includes one who testifies at a court-martial and anyone whose declaration is received in evidence for any purpose, including written declarations made by affidavit or otherwise.

For example, a person who by certificate has attested or otherwise authenticated an official record or other writing introduced in evidence is a witness.

For purposes of this rule, “preliminary hearing officer” includes any person who has examined charges under R.C.M. 405 and any person who was counsel for a member of a court of inquiry, or otherwise personally has conducted an investigation of the general matter involving the offenses charged.