Article 119. Manslaughter · MCM ¶ 57
2024 Manual for Courts-Martial, United States
Recent revisions Summary of changesMaximum punishment
(1) When committed upon a child under 16 years of age: DD, TF, 20 yrs, E-1. (Category 4)
(2) All other cases: DD, TF, 15 years, E-1. (Category 4)
Sample specification
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location), on or about __________, willfully and unlawfully kill __________, (a child under 16 years of age) by __________ (him) (her) (in) (on) the __________ with a __________.
Elements
(1) That (state the name or description of the alleged victim) is dead;
(2) That (his) (her) death resulted from the (act) (omission) of the accused in (state the act or omission alleged) at (state the time and place alleged);
(3) That the killing of (state the name or description of the alleged victim) by the accused was unlawful; (and)
(4) That, at the time of the killing, the accused had the intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm upon (state the name or description of the alleged victim); [and].
[(5)] That (state the name or description of the alleged victim) was a child under the age of 16 years.
Definitions & other instructions
Killing a human being is unlawful when done without legal justification or excuse.
The offense of voluntary manslaughter is committed when a person, with intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm, unlawfully kills a human being in the heat of sudden passion caused by adequate provocation.
Heat of passion may result from fear or rage. A person may be provoked to such an extent that in the heat of sudden passion caused by the provocation, although not in necessary defense of life or to prevent bodily harm, a fatal blow may be struck before self-control has returned. Proof that the accused was acting in the heat of passion caused by adequate provocation is not required. It is essential, however, that the (four) (five) elements I have listed for you be proved beyond a reasonable doubt before the accused can be convicted of voluntary manslaughter.
When an individual with intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm attempts unlawfully to kill or to inflict great bodily harm upon a person (while in the heat of sudden passion caused by adequate provocation), but, by mistake or inadvertence, kills another person, the individual is still criminally responsible for the killing with the intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm because the intent is transferred from the intended victim of (his) (her) action to the actual victim. If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim is dead and that his/her death resulted from the unlawful (act) (failure to act) of the accused in (state the act or failure to act alleged) with intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm upon (state the name or description of the individual other than the victim) you may still find the accused guilty of the voluntary manslaughter of (state the name or description of the alleged victim).
Knowledge that (state the name or description of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years is not an element of the offense.
Accordingly, if you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense, you are advised that the prosecution is not required to prove that the accused knew that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense, and it is not a defense to voluntary manslaughter upon a child even if the accused reasonably believed that (state the name of the alleged victim) was at least 16 years old.
Maximum punishment
(1) When committed upon a child under 16 years of age: DD, TF, 15 years, E-1. (Category 3)
(2) All other cases: DD, TF, 10 years, E-1. (Category 3)
Sample specification
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location), on or about __________, by culpable negligence, unlawfully kill __________ (a child under 16 years of age) by __________ (him) (her) (in) (on) the __________ with a __________.
Elements
(1) That (state the name or description of the alleged victim) is dead;
(2) That (his) (her) death resulted from the (act) (omission) of the accused in (state the act or omission alleged) at (state the time and place alleged);
(3) That the killing of (state the name or description of the alleged victim) by the accused was unlawful; (and)
(4) That this (act) (omission) constituted culpable negligence; [and]
[(5)] That (state the name or description of the alleged victim) was a child under the age of 16 years.
Definitions & other instructions
Killing a human being is unlawful when done without legal justification or excuse.
“Culpable negligence” is a degree of carelessness greater than simple negligence. ‘Simple negligence” is the absence of due care. The law requires everyone at all times to demonstrate the care for the safety of others that a reasonably careful person would demonstrate under the same or similar circumstances; this is what “due care” means. “Culpable negligence” is a negligent act or failure to act accompanied by a gross, reckless, wanton, or deliberate disregard for the foreseeable results to others.
You may find the accused guilty of involuntary manslaughter, only if you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the (act) (omission) of the accused which caused the death amounted to “culpable negligence.”
Knowledge that (state the name or description of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years is not an element of the offense.
Accordingly, if you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense, you are advised that the prosecution is not required to prove that the accused knew that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense, and it is not a defense to involuntary manslaughter upon a child even if the accused reasonably believed that (state the name of the alleged victim) was at least 16 years old.
When there is no legal duty to act, there can be no neglect and therefore no duty no crime is committed. (For example, when a stranger makes no effort to save a drowning person, or a person allows a beggar to freeze or starve to death, they are not culpably negligent in allowing this to happen).
Maximum punishment
(1) When committed upon a child under 16 years of age: DD, TF, 15 years, E-1. (Category 3)
(2) All other cases: DD, TF, 10 years, E-1. (Category 3)
Sample specification
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board--location), on or about __________, while (perpetrating) (attempting to perpetrate) an offense directly affecting the person of __________, to wit: (maiming) (a battery) (__________) unlawfully kill __________ (a child under 16 years of age) by __________ (him) (her) (in) (on) the __________ with a __________.
Elements
(1) That (state the name or description of the alleged victim) is dead;
(2) That (his) (her) death resulted from the (act) (omission) of the accused in (state the act or omission alleged) at (state the time and place alleged);
(3) That the killing of (state the name or description of the alleged victim) by the accused was unlawful; (and)
(4) That, at the time of the killing, the accused was perpetrating the (attempted) commission of the offense of (assault) (battery) (false imprisonment) (maiming) (__________) directly affecting the person of (state the name or description of the alleged victim); [and].
[(5)] That (state the name or description of the alleged victim) was a child under the age of 16 years.
Definitions & other instructions
The killing of a human being is unlawful when done without legal justification or excuse.
An “offense directly affecting the person” means an offense affecting some particular person as distinguished from an offense affecting society in general.
To find that the accused was participating in the (attempted) commission of the offense of (assault) (battery) (false imprisonment) (maiming) (__________), you must be satisfied by legal and competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt:
To find whether the killing, if any, was committed while the accused (was participating in) (attempted) (state the offense directly affecting the victim), you must find beyond a reasonable doubt that an act of the accused which caused the victim’s death and the (state the offense alleged to have been perpetrated or attempted) occurred at substantially the same time and place. Additionally, you must find a causal connection between the commission of the (attempted) offense of (state the offense alleged to have been perpetrated or attempted) and the act which caused the victim’s death.
Knowledge that (state the name or description of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years is not an element of the offense.
Accordingly, if you are convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense, you are advised that the prosecution is not required to prove that the accused knew that (state the name of the alleged victim) was under the age of 16 years at the time of the alleged offense, and it is not a defense to involuntary manslaughter upon a child even if the accused reasonably believed that (state the name of the alleged victim) was at least 16 years old.