Section III · Exclusionary Rules and Related Matters Concerning Self-Incrimination, Search and Seizure, and Eyewitness Identification

Rule 317. Interception of wire and oral communications

2024 Manual for Courts-Martial, United States

Recent revisions Summary of changes Cited by (3)
(a) General rule. Wire or oral communications constitute evidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search or seizure within the meaning of Mil. R. Evid. 311 when such evidence must be excluded under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as applied to members of the Armed Forces or if such evidence must be excluded under a federal statute applicable to members of the Armed Forces.
(b) When Authorized by Court Order. Evidence from the interception of wire or oral communications is admissible when authorized pursuant to an application to a federal judge of competent jurisdiction under the provisions of a federal statute.
Discussion
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2516(1), the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney General, or any Assistant Attorney General, any acting Assistant Attorney General, or any Deputy Assistant Attorney General or acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Criminal Division or National Security Division specially designated by the Attorney General, may authorize an application to a Federal judge of competent jurisdiction for, and such judge may grant in conformity with 18 U.S.C. 2518, an order authorizing or approving the interception of wire or oral communications by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or a Federal agency having responsibility for the investigation of the offense as to which the application is made, for purposes of obtaining evidence concerning the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. 2516(1), to the extent such offenses are punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
(c) Regulations. Notwithstanding any other provision of these rules, evidence obtained by members of the Armed Forces or their agents through interception of wire or oral communications for law enforcement purposes is not admissible unless such interception:
(1) takes place in the United States and is authorized under subdivision (b);
(2) takes place outside the United States and is authorized under regulations issued by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned; or
(3) is authorized under regulations issued by the Secretary of Defense or the Secretary concerned and is not unlawful under applicable federal statutes.
Cross-referencesCited by 3Cites 1
Cited by

Provisions elsewhere in the Manual whose text cites Rule 317. Each link opens the citing provision.

Rules for Courts-Martial
Discussion under R.C.M. 303 — Preliminary inquiry into reported offenses
…of Evidence should be consulted when conducting interrogations ( see Mil. R. Evid. 301-306), searches ( see Mil. R. Evid. 311-317), and eyewitness identifications (see Mil. R. Evid. 321). If the offense is one for which the Department of…
Military Rules of Evidence
Mil. R. Evid. 311(b)(1) — Evidence obtained from unlawful searches and seizures
…applicable to trials by court-martial that requires exclusion of evidence obtained in violation thereof, or Mil. R. Evid. 312-317;
Mil. R. Evid. 311(e) — Evidence obtained from unlawful searches and seizures
…finding of guilty waives all issues under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Mil. R. Evid. 311-317 with respect to the offense, whether or not raised prior to plea.
Rule 317 cites

Provisions named in the text of Rule 317. Where the cited provision is on this site, the link opens it.