U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Opinions — 1997 Term

Oct 1, 1996 – Sep 30, 1997
DecidedCaseDocketCitationDigest
U.S. v. Lynn 95-0346/AF — —
U.S. v. Maxwell 95-0751/AF — —
U.S. v. St. Jean 95-0756/AF — —
U.S. v. Haney 93-0157/AF — —
U.S. v. Niles 95-0738/AF — —
U.S. v. Barrow 95-0813/AF — —
U.S. v. Curtis 96-0104/AF — —
U.S. v. Mason 96-5004/AF — —
U.S. v. Cottrill 96-0138/AF — —
U.S. v. Zamberlan 96-0292/AF — —
U.S. v. Diaz 95-1066/MC — —
U.S. v. Washington 96-5005/NA — —
U.S. v. Ruth 96-0155/AR — —
U.S. v. Johnson 96-0590/AF — —
U.S. v. Brock 96-0673/AF — —
U.S. v. Harwood 96-0105/AF — —
U.S. v. Solis 96-0221/AF — —
U.S. v. Cook 96-5003/AF — —
U.S. v. Lloyd 96-0098/AF — —
U.S. v. Edwards 96-0126/NA — —
U.S. v. Christy 96-0713/AF — —
U.S. v. Rivera 96-0628/AF — —
U.S. v. Pelkey 96-0013/AR — —
U.S. v. Miller 96-0772/AR — —
U.S. v. Hardy 96-0356/AR — —
U.S. v. Gibson 96-0545/AR — —
U.S. v. Miller 95-0992/AR — —
U.S. v. Bond 96-0156/AF — —
U.S. v. Shaffer 96-0229/NA — —
U.S. v. Curtis 94-7001/MC — —
U.S. v. Greaves 96-0715/AF — —
U.S. v. Becker 96-0659/AR — —
U.S. v. Hall 96-1240/AF — —
U.S. v. Pruitt 96-0776/AF — —
U.S. v. Hughey 96-0798/AF — —
U.S. v. Moreno 96-0662/AF — —
U.S. v. Harris 96-0710/AR — —
U.S. v. Hudson 96-0894/MC — —
U.S. v. Minyard 96-0901/AF — —
U.S. v. Reid 96-5006/AR — —
U.S. v Gomez 96-1030/AR — —
U.S. v. Miller 96-0934/AR — —
U.S. v. Johnson 96-0669/NA — —
U.S. v. Willis 96-0910/AF — —
U.S. v. Romano 96-0117/AF — —
U.S. v. Faisca 96-0788/AR — —
U.S. v. Napoleon 96-0919/AF — —
U.S. v. Thomas 95-7001/MA — —
U.S. v. Milton 96-0962/AR — —
U.S. v. Chatman 96-0306/AF — —
U.S. v. Catalani 96-0875/AF — —
U.S. v. Wansley 96-1132/AF — —
U.S. v. Lewis 96-0958/AF — —
U.S. v. Santoro 96-0985/NA — —
U.S. v. Kosek 96-1060/AF — —
U.S. v. Bell 96-1218/NA — —
U.S. v. Argo 96-0101/AF — —
U.S. v. Buller 96-0232/AF — —
U.S. v. Thompson 96-5009/MA — —
U.S. v. Washington 95-0721/AF — —
U.S. v. Lavender 96-1233/AF — —
U.S. v. Bygrave 96-0702/NA — —
U.S. v. Helms 96-1167/AF — —
U.S. v. Breese 94-0495/AR — —
U.S. v. Lorenzen 96-1036/AF — —
U.S. v. Poole 96-1125/MA — —
U.S. v. Ellis 96-1177/MA — —
U.S. v. Klauck 96-1338/NA — —
U.S. v. Morgan 96-1022/AF — —
U.S. v. Hamilton 96-1407/AF — —
U.S. v. Payne 96-0403/AR — —
U.S. v. Hyder 96-1165/AF — —
U.S. v. Waterman 96-1383/AF — —
U.S. v. Vanderbush 97-5003/AR — —
U.S. v. Hicks 96-1212/AF — —
U.S. v. Hood 96-0548/AR — —
U.S. v. Mark 96-0746/NA — —
U.S. v. Howard 95-0690/MA — —
U.S. v. Schelke 96-0220/AF — —
U.S. v. Polk 96-1052/AR — —
U.S. v. Dresen 93-0949/AF — —
U.S. v. Hysong 96-0889/AF — —
U.S. v. Cornett 96-1062/MA — —
U.S. v. Rogers 96-1250/AF — —
U.S. v. White 96-1253/AR — —
U.S. v. Williams 96-1306/AF — —
U.S. v. Black 96-0121/AR — —
U.S. v. Wilson 96-1249/AF — —
U.S. v. Wiley 96-1309/AF — —
U.S. v. McCarthy 96-1393/NA — —
U.S. v. Tarleton 96-0430/AF — —
U.S. v. Kaspers 96-0730/AR — —
U.S. v. Bartley 95-0342/AF — —
U.S. v. Duvall 96-0862/AF — —
U.S. v. Britton 96-1002/AF — —
U.S. v. Stadler 96-1059/AF — —
U.S. v. English 96-1063/MA — —
U.S. v. Moulton 96-1192/AF — —
U.S. v. Peterson 96-1376/AR — —
U.S. v. Ginn 95-0033/AR — —
U.S. v. Denier 96-0435/AF — —
U.S. v. Cabral 96-0596/AF — —
U.S. v. Riley 96-1144/NA — —
U.S. v. Tulloch 96-5008/AR — —
U.S. v. Witham 96-1179/MA — —
U.S. v. Bush 96-1239/AF — —
U.S. v. Taylor 96-1241/AF — —
U.S. v. Combs 96-1246/AF — —
U.S. v. Youngblood 96-1256/AF — —
U.S. v. Turner 97-5002/NA — —
U.S. v. Miller 96-5010/AF — —
U.S. v. Smith 96-5007/MC — —

Case names are linked to the opinion PDF on the court's site. “Digest” counts the topics under which the court's digest treats the opinion; the court shows a citation only once the Military Justice Reporter volume is published.

Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).