CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Adams, 86 M.J. 292
Decided Nov 12, 2025 · No. 25-0217/AR · October 2025 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 5 topics
First Principles: Jurisdiction: Of Courts of Criminal Appeals
- neither the CAAF nor a CCA has jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a noncapital case after a court-martial is final and a punitive discharge or a dismissal has been executed
First Principles: Jurisdiction: Of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
- neither the CAAF nor a CCA has jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a noncapital case after a court-martial is final and a punitive discharge or a dismissal has been executed
Trial Stages: Appeals: Courts of Criminal Appeals › Generally
- neither the CAAF nor a CCA has jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a noncapital case after a court-martial is final and a punitive discharge or a dismissal has been executed
Trial Stages: Appeals: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
- the CAAF reviews questions of its jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of a CCA de novo
- neither the CAAF nor a CCA has jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a noncapital case after a court-martial is final and a punitive discharge or a dismissal has been executed
- in this noncapital case, appellant's court-martial was final under Article 71(c), UCMJ, when the CAAF denied reconsideration of its decision to deny his petition for review and the convening authority ordered the discharge executed even though the Supreme Court had not yet denied appellant's petition for a writ of certiorari; Article 71(c)(1)(B), UCMJ, gives the word "final" a special definition that supersedes the ordinary meaning of the word; Congress considered the issue of extending finality until after the Supreme Court denied review but chose in Article 71(c)(1)(C), UCMJ, to do so only in cases in which the CAAF has granted review of a petition and review is completed; Article 71(c)(1)(C), UCMJ, does not apply here because this Court did not grant appellant's petition for review
Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.
- the CAAF reviews questions of its jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of a CCA de novo
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).