CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Nelson, 82 M.J. 336
Decided Jul 22, 2022 · No. 21-0216/NA · October 2021 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 1 topic
Trial Stages: Appeals: Waiver
- the purpose of the waiver doctrine is to promote the efficiency of the entire justice system by requiring the parties to advance their claims at trial, where the underlying facts can best be determined in this case, where consistent with the requirements of MRE 103(a)(1)(A)–(B), the record shows that appellant timely objected to the admission of his statements to NCIS on the specific ground that they were obtained in violation of Article 31(b), UCMJ, appellant did not waive his argument that the military judge should have suppressed for all purposes the statement he gave to investigators as opposed to suppressing it for just one charge).
- where all parties at trial fully appreciate the substance of the defense objection and the military judge has full opportunity to consider it, waiver should not apply
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).