CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Muller, 79 M.J. 359

Decided Feb 12, 2020 · No. 19-0230/AF · October 2019 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 1 topic

Trial Stages: Appeals: Courts of Criminal Appeals › Generally

  1. Rule 15.5 of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals Rules of Practice and Procedure, which allows counsel 10 days in a remanded case to submit supplemental pleadings, is invalid because it directly conflicts with the Joint Courts of Criminal Appeals Rules of Practice and Procedure 15(b), which allows 60 days for supplemental pleadings, and because it conflicts with United States v. Gilley, 59 M.J. 245 (CAAF 2004)
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).