CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Stout, 79 M.J. 168

Decided Aug 22, 2019 · No. 18-0273/AR · October 2018 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 2 topics

Trial Stages: Pretrial: Charges and Specifications

  1. Article 34, UCMJ, specifically allows the government to make changes to the charges and specifications to bring them into alignment with the evidence adduced by the pretrial investigation; the words of Article 34 are clear and unambiguous: before referral, changes may be made to conform the specifications to the evidence contained in the report of the Article 32 investigating officer

Miscellaneous Matters: Statutes, Treaties, Regulations, Executive Orders, Directives, etc.: Generally

  1. the plain language of a statute will control, unless use of the plain language would lead to an absurd result
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).