CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Tucker, 76 M.J. 257

Decided May 23, 2017 · No. 17-0160/AR · October 2016 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 3 topics

Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 134 - General Article Pre-2019 offenses

  1. in Article 134, UCMJ, the term ‘neglects’ simply refers to the failure of a servicemember to perform an act that it was his or her duty to perform; stated differently, the term ‘neglects’ has no connection to the mens rea requirement that the government must prove under the statute; the word ‘neglect’ indicates, as a purely objective fact, that a person has not done that which it was his or her duty to do; it does not indicate the reason for this failure; a person can ‘neglect’ his or her duty either intentionally or negligently

Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.

  1. as a first step in statutory construction, an appellate court is obligated to engage in a plain language analysis of the relevant statute

Miscellaneous Matters: Statutes, Treaties, Regulations, Executive Orders, Directives, etc.: Generally

  1. as a first step in statutory construction, an appellate court is obligated to engage in a plain language analysis of the relevant statute
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).