CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Serianne, 69 M.J. 8

Decided May 4, 2010 · No. 10-5001/NA · September 2009 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 3 topics

Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 92 - Failure to Obey Order or Regulation Pre-2019 offenses

  1. the self-reporting requirement imposed on sailors by a Chief of Naval Operations instruction to notify their commanding officer of an arrest by civil authorities for an alcohol-related offense did not provide those sailors with the rights afforded by a superior competent authority in a self-reporting exclusion in Article 1137 of the US Navy Regulations, an exclusion that eliminates the reporting requirement in instances where a person is already criminally involved in offenses he would otherwise be required to report; as such, the instruction did not provide a legal basis for finding the accused derelict in the performance of a required duty when he failed to report an arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol, and the military judge did not err in dismissing the charge

Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.

  1. an appellate court reviews both the constitutionality and interpretation of a service instruction under a de novo standard of review

Miscellaneous Matters: Statutes, Treaties, Regulations, Executive Orders, Directives, etc.: Regulations

  1. the self-reporting requirement imposed on sailors by a Chief of Naval Operations instruction to notify their commanding officer of an arrest by civil authorities for an alcohol-related offense did not provide those sailors with the rights afforded by a superior competent authority in a self-reporting exclusion in Article 1137 of the US Navy Regulations, an exclusion that eliminates the reporting requirement in instances where a person is already criminally involved in offenses he would otherwise be required to report; as such, the instruction did not provide a legal basis for finding the accused derelict in the performance of a required duty when he failed to report an arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol, and the military judge did not err in dismissing the charge
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).