CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Daly, 69 M.J. 485
Decided Mar 28, 2011 · No. 10-6010/CG · September 2010 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 5 topics
First Principles: Jurisdiction: Generally
- a question of jurisdiction is not subject to waiver and may be raised at any time
- federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction; they possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute
First Principles: Jurisdiction: Of Courts of Criminal Appeals
- where the government’s notice of appeal under Article 62 was not timely filed, the CCA was without jurisdiction to consider the government’s appeal
Trial Stages: Writs and Interlocutory Appeals: Article 62 Appeal
- under Article 62, UCMJ, the United States may appeal an order or ruling of a military judge that terminates the proceedings with respect to a charge or specification; an appeal of an order or ruling may not be taken unless the trial counsel provides the military judge with written notice of appeal from the order or ruling within 72 hours of the order or ruling
- where the government failed to file either a motion for reconsideration of the order to dismiss or a notice of appeal within the 72 hour period for government appeals authorized in Article 62(a)(2), but instead took 12 days to finalize and submit a brief to the military judge asking for reconsideration of the order to dismiss, the government’s action was untimely under the explicit limitation of Article 62
- where the government’s notice of appeal under Article 62 was not timely filed, the CCA was without jurisdiction to consider the government’s appeal
Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.
- jurisdiction is a question of law that an appellate court reviews de novo
Trial Stages: Appeals: Waiver
- a question of jurisdiction is not subject to waiver and may be raised at any time
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).