CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Bradford, 68 M.J. 371

Decided Feb 26, 2010 · No. 10-6003/AF · September 2009 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 1 topic

Trial Stages: Writs and Interlocutory Appeals: Article 62 Appeal

  1. Article 62(a)(1)(B), UCMJ, authorizes the government to pursue an interlocutory appeal of an order or ruling which excludes evidence that is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding; however, prosecution appeals are disfavored and are permitted only upon specific statutory authorization
  2. a military judge’s decision not to “preadmit” a drug testing report did not constitute an order or ruling which excludes evidence that is substantial proof of a fact material in the proceeding from which the government could pursue an interlocutory appeal under Article 62, UCMJ; the military judge set forth foundational criteria for the admissibility of the report, but did not exclude specific evidence of particular statements by specific persons
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).