CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
United States v. Springer, 59 M.J. 164
Digested under 1 topic
Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.
- the test for legal sufficiency of evidence is whether, considering the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a reasonable factfinder could have found all the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt; furthermore, this Court will draw every reasonable inference from the evidence of record in favor of the prosecution
- the Court reviews a military judge's decision to admit evidence for abuse of discretion; if the military judge makes findings of fact, the Court reviews the findings under a clearly erroneous standard of review; the Court reviews conclusions of law de novo
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).