CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Baker, 57 M.J. 330
Decided Sep 30, 2002 · No. 01-0064/AF · 2002 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 2 topics
Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 134 - Indecent Acts or Liberties with a Child Pre-2019 offenses
- the offense of "indecent acts or liberties with a child" may be prosecuted at court-martial as a service discredit, or disorder, under Article 134, UCMJ; see paragraph 87b(1), Part IV, Manual; lack of consent by the child to the act or conduct is not essential to this offense; consent is not a defense; see paragraph 87c(1), Part IV, Manual
- not all sexual conduct between a service person and a person under the age of 16 is per se indecent and therefore a crime; not all sexual conduct between a service person and a person under the age of 16 is indecent because the alleged victim is legally incapable of consenting to sexual acts; factual consent of the alleged victim may be irrelevant to determining whether a service person is guilty of indecent acts with a child
Trial Stages: Merits: Instructions › Generally
- in the military justice system, it is the military judge who is required to tailor the instructions to the particular facts and issues in a case
- appropriate instructions means those instructions necessary for the members to arrive at an intelligent decision concerning appellant’s guilt; an intelligent or rational decision on a person’s guilt requires consideration of the elements of a charged offense, the evidence pertaining to those elements, and applicable principles of law necessary to decide the case
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).