CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Stringer, 55 M.J. 92

Decided Jun 12, 2001 · No. 01-0056/AR · 2001 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 2 topics

Core Criminal Law Subjects: Burdens, Standards, Presumptions, Inferences: Trial Burdens, Standards › Pretrial Punishment

  1. pretrial punishment includes public denunciation and degradation
  2. a military judge has broad authority to order administrative credit against adjudged confinement as a remedy for Article 13 violations
  3. a newspaper article describing the facts of appellant’s pretrial punishment, summarizing relevant case law on pretrial punishment, and cautioning that pretrial punishment is illegal complied with a military judge’s order to publish such an article in the post paper
  4. where the military judge gave appellant significant confinement credit for pretrial punishment and appellant does not assert that this credit is inadequate, and where SJA complied with military judge’s order to publish an article about pretrial punishment in the post newspaper, additional relief is not warranted

Trial Stages: Pretrial: Pretrial Punishment

  1. pretrial punishment includes public denunciation and degradation
  2. a military judge has broad authority to order administrative credit against adjudged confinement as a remedy for Article 13 violations
  3. a newspaper article describing the facts of appellant’s pretrial punishment, summarizing relevant case law on pretrial punishment, and cautioning that pretrial punishment is illegal complied with a military judge’s order to publish such an article in the post paper
  4. where the military judge gave appellant significant confinement credit for pretrial punishment and appellant does not assert that this credit is inadequate, and where SJA complied with military judge’s order to publish an article about pretrial punishment in the post newspaper, additional relief is not warranted
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).