CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Pritt, 54 M.J. 47

Decided Aug 31, 2000 · No. 99-0912/NA · 2000 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 3 topics

Core Criminal Law Subjects: Crimes: Article 95 - Resistance, Flight, Breach of Arrest, and Escape Pre-2019 offenses

  1. amendment to Article 95, UCMJ, making flight from apprehension criminal, was effective on February 10, 1996, the date upon which the President signed the legislation in consonance with the rule that a law takes effect on the date of its enactment

Miscellaneous Matters: Statutes, Treaties, Regulations, Executive Orders, Directives, etc.: United States Code

  1. amendment to Article 95, UCMJ, making flight from apprehension criminal, was effective on February 10, 1996, the date upon which the President signed the legislation in consonance with the rule that a law takes effect on the date of its enactment

Miscellaneous Matters: Statutes, Treaties, Regulations, Executive Orders, Directives, etc.: Executive Orders

  1. Executive Order promulgating changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial did not change effective date of amendment to Article 95, UCMJ, as the legislation had been previously changed and the conduct proscribed made punishable when enacted, and Executive Order did not provide any additional safeguards to servicemembers with regard to the amendment
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).