CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Scalarone, 54 M.J. 114
Decided Sep 11, 2000 · No. 00-5001/MC · 2000 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 6 topics
Core Criminal Law Subjects: Burdens, Standards, Presumptions, Inferences: Trial Burdens, Standards › Pretrial Punishment
- failure to request sentence credit for unlawful pretrial punishment or illegal pretrial confinement at trial does not forfeit such a claim in the absence of plain error or waive such a claim forever
Trial Stages: Pretrial: Pretrial Confinement
- failure to request sentence credit for unlawful pretrial punishment or illegal pretrial confinement at trial does not forfeit such a claim in the absence of plain error or waive such a claim forever
Trial Stages: Pretrial: Pretrial Punishment
- failure to request sentence credit for unlawful pretrial punishment or illegal pretrial confinement at trial does not forfeit such a claim in the absence of plain error or waive such a claim forever
Trial Stages: Sentence and Punishment: Credits
- failure to request sentence credit for unlawful pretrial punishment or illegal pretrial confinement at trial does not forfeit such a claim in the absence of plain error or waive such a claim forever
Trial Stages: Appeals: Courts of Criminal Appeals › Generally
- Court of Criminal Appeals did not err in following decision of Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces where neither the Supreme Court nor the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces had overruled the decision, nor had there been any subsequent change in the law affecting that decision
Trial Stages: Appeals: Waiver
- United States v. Huffman, 40 MJ 225 (CMA 1994), providing that an issue of illegal pretrial confinement not raised at trial may be raised for the first time on appeal, was not shown to be either unworkable or badly reasoned, and therefore would not be overruled
- failure to request sentence credit for unlawful pretrial punishment or illegal pretrial confinement at trial does not forfeit such a claim in the absence of plain error or waive such a claim forever
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).