CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Harris, 53 M.J. 86

Decided Jun 5, 2000 · No. 99-0731/AR · 2000 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 2 topics

Trial Stages: Appeals: Remedies › Generally

  1. where disapproval of certain offenses reduced the maximum period of confinement from life to 18 months, such a vast disparity between the maximum punishments for the offenses dismissed and those affirmed made it impossible for a court to ascertain that appellant’s sentence would have been no greater than a bad-conduct discharge and ten months confinement absent the dismissed offenses; this case presents one of those occasions when the only fair course of action is to have an accused resentenced at the trial level

Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.

  1. a sentence reassessment is reviewed for abuse of discretion; a lower court’s reassessment will only be disturbed to prevent obvious miscarriages of justice or abuses of discretion
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).