CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Williams, 53 M.J. 316

Decided Aug 24, 2000 · No. 99-0973/MC · 2000 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 2 topics

First Principles: Jurisdiction: In Personam

  1. other than a few narrow exceptions, jurisdiction over active duty military personnel continues until the member receives a valid discharge; there is a final accounting of pay; and the member has completed administrative clearance processes required by his or her service Secretary
  2. jurisdiction over appellant did not terminate where a valid legal hold was initiated before the expiration of the date that constituted the effective date of the discharge

Trial Stages: Post-Trial Hearings: DuBay / Factfinding Hearings

  1. under United States v. Ginn, 47 MJ 236 (1997), there was no error by the Court of Criminal Appeals in refusing to remand this case for a hearing on jurisdiction where an initial conflict between affidavits was resolved by a second affidavit submitted by one of the affiants
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).