CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Hardcastle, 53 M.J. 299
Decided Aug 18, 2000 · No. 99-0632/MC · 2000 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 2 topics
Trial Stages: Merits: Guilty Pleas
- appellant’s pleas were improvident where he pleaded guilty relying on an incorrect belief that, under his pretrial agreement as expressly interpreted by the military judge, he would continue to receive $400 pay per month to go to his dependents when in fact appellant would receive no pay while being held past the expiration of his enlistment to serve his adjudged confinement
Trial Stages: Merits: Pretrial Agreements
- an accused is entitled to the benefit of the bargain on which a guilty plea is based; where he does not receive the benefit of his bargain, his pleas may not be provident
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).