CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Avery, 52 M.J. 496

Decided Apr 14, 2000 · No. 96-1157/AR · 2000 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 3 topics

Trial Stages: Pretrial: Discovery

  1. the government is required to produce evidence that is relevant, material, and favorable to the accused, including information which may expose a witness’ motivation falsifying a rape complaint; the exposure of a witness’ motivation for testifying is a proper and important function of the constitutionally protected right of cross-examination
  2. defense affirmatively waived any objection to government’s nondisclosure of report of victim’s prior rape allegation where: (1) defense made no motion for continuance; (2) defense made no motion to compel discovery; (3) defense counsel affirmatively stated at trial that the defense did not intend to go into the matter of the prior rape complaint; and, (4), after receiving the report after trial, defense did not raise the issue at a post-trial Article 39(a) session
  3. although government erred by failing to provide a law enforcement report of investigation pursuant to a defense request for discovery before trial, there was no plain error where: (1) the defense had a number of opportunities to remedy this situation by requesting a continuance to compel discovery; (2) the defense made a tactical decision not to present evidence of the victim’s prior rape allegation against another soldier; and, (3) there was no evidence or indication in the report that the victim’s allegations were false

Trial Stages: Appeals: Preservation of Error / Plain Error

  1. appellant has the burden to show plain error, which is error that is clear or obvious and that materially prejudices the substantial rights of appellant; once appellant has met his burden of persuasion, the burden shifts to the government to show that the error was not prejudicial
  2. although government erred by failing to provide a law enforcement report of investigation pursuant to a defense request for discovery before trial, there was no plain error where: (1) the defense had a number of opportunities to remedy this situation by requesting a continuance to compel discovery; (2) the defense made a tactical decision not to present evidence of the victim’s prior rape allegation against another soldier; and, (3) there was no evidence or indication in the report that the victim’s allegations were false

Trial Stages: Appeals: Waiver

  1. waiver of fundamental constitutional rights must be knowingly and intelligently rendered; courts indulge every reasonable presumption against such waiver and do not presume acquiescence in relinquishment of these rights; waiver of fundamental rights must be an affirmative action, not merely a failure to object
  2. defense affirmatively waived any objection to government’s nondisclosure of report of victim’s prior rape allegation where: (1) defense made no motion for continuance; (2) defense made no motion to compel discovery; (3) defense counsel affirmatively stated at trial that the defense did not intend to go into the matter of the prior rape complaint; and, (4), after receiving the report after trial, defense did not raise the issue at a post-trial Article 39(a) session
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).