CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Haagenson, 52 M.J. 34
Decided Sep 28, 1999 · No. 98-0581/MC · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 4 topics
Military Justice Personnel: Convening Authority: Referral
- convening authority or superior competent authority may withdraw charges from a court-martial at any time before findings are announced, and such charges may be re-referred to another court-martial unless the withdrawal was for in improper reason; RCM 604(a), (b), and Discussion thereto
Trial Stages: Post-Trial Hearings: Authority for
- where a claim that unlawful command influence pressured a commander to change his discretionary referral decision was supported by affidavit sufficient to raise such issue, and the claim was neither inadequate on its face nor conclusively refuted by the files and records of the case, a factfinding hearing is necessary
Trial Stages: Appeals: Courts of Criminal Appeals › Generally
- where a claim that unlawful command influence pressured a commander to change his discretionary referral decision was supported by affidavit sufficient to raise such issue, and the claim was neither inadequate on its face nor conclusively refuted by the files and records of the case, the Court of Criminal Appeals was not in a position to resolve the controverted issue without a prior evidentiary hearing; Court of Criminal Appeals is not authorized to decide disputed questions of fact pertaining to post-trial claims, solely or in part on the basis of conflicting affidavits submitted by the parties
Trial Stages: Appeals: Remedies › DuBay/Factfinding hearing
- where a claim that unlawful command influence pressured a commander to change his discretionary referral decision was supported by affidavit sufficient to raise such issue, and the claim was neither inadequate on its face nor conclusively refuted by the files and records of the case, a factfinding hearing is necessary
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).