CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Dawson, 51 M.J. 411
Decided Sep 9, 1999 · No. 98-0434/MC · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 2 topics
Trial Stages: Initial Review: Revocation of Suspension
- under circumstances of this case, it was appropriate for an accused who sought some benefit from waiving a vacation proceeding to do so through communications and agreement directly with the convening authority; such negotiations do not require the approval of a military judge because, just like dismissal of pending charges, they involved matters within the prerogative of commanders and do not involve a modification of the original pretrial agreement
- an accused may waive defects in a vacation proceeding and avoid a new vacation proceeding through communications and agreement directly with the convening authority; such an agreement is collateral to the original court-martial, but remains subject to appellate review of claims that an appellant misunderstood the agreement’s meaning and effect or that there was government overreaching
Trial Stages: Appeals: Scope of Review
- an accused may waive defects in a vacation proceeding and avoid a new vacation proceeding through communications and agreement directly with the convening authority; such an agreement is collateral to the original court-martial, but remains subject to appellate review of claims that an appellant misunderstood the agreement’s meaning and effect or that there was government overreaching
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).