CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Bickley, 50 M.J. 93
Decided Apr 7, 1999 · No. 98-0036/AR · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 3 topics
Core Criminal Law Subjects: Defenses: Mistake of Fact
- accused’s mention during sentencing that he thought he read a training manual which gave him until 0900 to turn a personal weapon into arms room raised only a mere possibility of a mistake of law which was insufficient to overturn guilty plea to violating lawful general regulation
Trial Stages: Merits: Guilty Pleas
- the factual predicate for a plea is adequate if the accused himself reveals facts which objectively support the plea
- guilty plea will not be rejected unless there is a substantial basis in fact and law for questioning the plea; mere possibility of a defense will not support overturning a guilty plea
- accused’s mention during sentencing that he thought he read a training manual which gave him until 0900 to turn a personal weapon into arms room raised only a mere possibility of a mistake of law which was insufficient to overturn guilty plea to violating lawful general regulation
Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.
- guilty plea will not be rejected on appeal unless there is a substantial basis in fact and law for questioning the plea; mere possibility of a defense will not support overturning a guilty plea
- where post-trial efforts to undermine guilty plea contradict accused’s admissions on the record, and where matter inconsistent with plea was not fully developed on the record as a result of the guilty plea, speculation on such post-trial matters is inappropriate on appeal
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).