CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
Steele v. Van Riper, 50 M.J. 89
Decided Mar 26, 1999 · No. 98-8010/MC · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 8 topics
First Principles: Jurisdiction: In Personam
- issuance of an administrative discharge after trial does not negate the convening authority’s responsibility or power to act on findings or sentence
First Principles: Jurisdiction: Of Courts of Criminal Appeals
- issuance of an administrative discharge after trial does not negate the power of the Courts of Criminal Appeals to act on the findings and sentence
First Principles: Jurisdiction: Of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
- issuance of an administrative discharge after trial does not negate the power of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to act on the findings and sentence
Military Justice Personnel: Convening Authority: Action
- issuance of administrative discharge after trial has the effect of remitting an adjudged punitive discharge, but does not affect power or responsibility of convening authority to act on findings and sentence
Trial Stages: Initial Review: Action
- issuance of an administrative discharge after trial does not negate the convening authority’s responsibility or power to act on findings or sentence
Trial Stages: Appeals: Courts of Criminal Appeals › Generally
- issuance of an administrative discharge after trial does not negate the power of the Courts of Criminal Appeals to act on the findings and sentence
Trial Stages: Appeals: Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
- issuance of an administrative discharge after trial does not negate the power of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to act on the findings and sentence
Miscellaneous Matters: Statutes, Treaties, Regulations, Executive Orders, Directives, etc.: Generally
- administrative discharge issued after trial pursuant to statutes and regulations governing such discharges has the effect of remitting unapproved/unexecuted punitive discharge but does not impact upon the responsibilities of the convening authority or review by the appellate courts
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).