CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Schrode, 50 M.J. 459
Decided Jun 30, 1999 · No. 98-0029/MC · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 3 topics
Military Justice Personnel: Convening Authority: Action
- although action stated that convening authority had considered clemency submissions when there were no such submissions, this oversight was not prejudicial to appellant where there were in fact no such submissions
Trial Stages: Initial Review: Generally
- the objective of post-trial procedure is to ensure that the convening authority has all relevant information related to the accused and the charges prior to when he takes his action; post-trial procedure includes: (1) an optional submission by the accused, RCM 1105; (2) a recommendation by the SJA, when required, RCM 1106; and (3) an optional response to the SJA’s recommendation, RCM 1106(f)(4)
Trial Stages: Initial Review: Action
- although action stated that convening authority had considered clemency submissions when there were no such submissions, this oversight was not prejudicial to appellant where there were in fact no such submissions
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).