CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. Belflower, 50 M.J. 306
Decided May 19, 1999 · No. 98-5025/AF · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 2 topics
Trial Stages: Merits: Trial Procedures › Voir dire
- military judge has discretion to allow individual or group voir dire, and party seeking individual voir dire must show that it is necessary because certain questions could not be covered in group questioning
- questions which appear to have nothing inherent in them which would be likely to produce a response which would poison the remainder of the panel can be asked in group voir dire; but, even if there is a risk to the remainder of the panel, it is within the discretion of the military judge to take that risk
Trial Stages: Appeals: Standards of Review, Burdens, etc.
- military judge’s decision whether to allow individual or group voir dire is tested for an abuse of discretion
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).