CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic
U.S. v. McLaughlin, 50 M.J. 217
Decided Apr 28, 1999 · No. 96-0507/MC · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)
Digested under 3 topics
Trial Stages: Merits: Pretrial Agreements
- impermissible pretrial agreement terms should be declared unenforceable by military judge while upholding the remaining agreement; RCM 705(c)(1)(B)
- appellant is not entitled to relief on appeal from impermissible term of pretrial agreement waiving speedy trial issue absent prima facie showing or colorable claim of entitlement to relief, such as a showing of prejudice, demand for speedy trial, or lack of due diligence
Trial Stages: Appeals: Remedies › Generally
- appellant is not entitled to relief on appeal from impermissible term of pretrial agreement waiving speedy trial issue absent prima facie showing or colorable claim of entitlement to relief, such as a showing of prejudice, demand for speedy trial, or lack of due diligence
Miscellaneous Matters: Speedy Trial: Generally
- the Court rejects the notion that there is a “magic number” of days in pretrial confinement which would give rise to a presumption of a speedy trial violation; but see RCM 707
Source and status
This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.
Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).