CAAF Opinion Digest · one opinion, every topic

U.S. v. Reist, 50 M.J. 108

Decided Apr 7, 1999 · No. 98-0888/MC · 1999 Term · Opinion (PDF)

Digested under 3 topics

Military Justice Personnel: Defense Function: Responsibilities

  1. any issue as to whether trial counsel is so determined to convict and punish an accused that he became an “accuser” is waived by that accused’s failure to raise the issue at trial
  2. failure to object to improper argument constitutes waiver of the objection
  3. argument asking judge to minimize the effects of accused’s guilty pleas and characterizing accused’s actions as “cowardly criminal conduct of a sexual pervert” did not indicate animus, but were permissible hard blows that may be struck by trial counsel during sentencing argument

Trial Stages: Appeals: Preservation of Error / Plain Error

  1. To succeed under a plain error analysis, appellant has the burden of establishing that there was plain or obvious error that materially prejudiced his substantial rights
  2. (there was no material prejudice to appellant’s substantial rights where trial counsel had signed charge sheet as accuser, where appellant pleaded guilty and requested trial by judge alone after the disqualification was announced on the record and trial counsel argued that a request for judge alone should be denied, and where trial counsel’s actions did not show a personal interest in case

Trial Stages: Appeals: Waiver

  1. any issue as to whether trial counsel is so determined to convict and punish an accused that he became an “accuser” is waived by that accused’s failure to raise the issue at trial
  2. failure to object to improper argument constitutes waiver of the objection
Source and status

This is a verbatim mirror of the Opinion Digest and opinions tables published by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. The headnotes are the court staff’s summaries of the opinions, reproduced as published; they are not the opinions themselves and not this site’s commentary. Nothing here is edited on this site.

Last updated by the court: Oct 13, 2026 · mirrored Oct 29, 2026 · Always confirm a holding against the opinion itself (linked from each case name).