Article 131a. Subornation of perjury · MCM ¶ 82
2024 Manual for Courts-Martial, United States
Recent revisions Summary of changes3a-82-1PERJURY-SUBORNATION OF
Maximum punishment
DD, TF, 5 years, E-1. (Category 2)
Sample specification
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board—location), on or about __________, procure __________ to commit perjury by inducing (him) (her), the said __________, to take a lawful (oath) (affirmation) in a (trial by court-martial of __________) (trial by a court of competent jurisdiction, to wit: __________ of __________) (deposition for use in a trial by __________ of __________) (__________) that (he) (she), the said __________, would (testify) (depose) (__________) truly, and to (testify) (depose) (__________) willfully, corruptly, and contrary to such (oath) (affirmation) in substance that __________, which (testimony) (deposition) (__________) was upon a material matter and which the accused and the said __________ did not then believe to be true.
Elements
(1) That (state the time and place alleged), the accused induced and procured (state the name of the alleged perjurer) to take an oath or its equivalent and to falsely (testify) (depose) (state) upon such (oath) (affirmation) concerning a certain matter: (state the alleged matter in which the perjured testimony or statement was given);
(2) That the (oath) (affirmation) was administered to (state the name of the alleged perjurer) in a (matter) (__________) in which an oath or its equivalent was required or authorized by law;
(3) That the oath or its equivalent was administered by a person having authority to do so;
(4) That upon such oath or its equivalent (state the name of the alleged perjurer) willfully (made) (subscribed) a statement, to wit: (set forth the statement as alleged);
(5) That the statement was material;
(6) That the statement was false; and
(7) That the accused and (state the name of the alleged perjurer) did not then believe the statement to be true.
Definitions & other instructions
“Induce and procure” means to influence, persuade, or cause.
(An “oath” is a pledge that binds the person to speak the truth.)
(An “affirmation” is a solemn and formal pledge binding upon one’s conscience, that the truth will be stated.)
(“Subscribe” means to write one’s name on a document for the purpose of adopting its words as one’s own expressions.)
“Material” means important to the issue or matter of inquiry, but that matter need not be the main issue in the case.
As to the sixth element of this offense, there are special rules for proving the falsity of a statement in perjury trials. The falsity of a statement can be proven by testimony and documentary evidence by:
(1) The testimony of a witness which directly contradicts the statement of (state the name of the alleged perjurer) as described in the specification, as long as the witness’ testimony is corroborated or supported by the testimony of at least one other witness or by some other evidence which tends to prove the falsity of the statement. You may find the accused guilty of subornation of perjury only if you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the testimony of (state the name of witness), who has testified as to the falsity of the statement described in the specification, is believable and is corroborated or supported by other trustworthy evidence or testimony. To “corroborate” means to strengthen, to make more certain, to add weight. The corroboration required to prove perjury is proof of independent facts or circumstances which, considered together, tend to confirm the testimony of the single witness in establishing the falsity of the oath.
(2) Documentary evidence directly disproving the truth of the statement described in the specification as long as the evidence is corroborated or supported by other evidence tending to prove the falsity of the statement. To “corroborate” means to strengthen, to make more certain, to add weight. The corroboration required to prove perjury is proof of independent facts or circumstances which, considered together, tend to confirm the information contained in the document in establishing the falsity of the oath.
An exception to the requirement that documentary evidence must be supported by corroborating evidence is when the document is an official record which has been proven to have been well known to (state the name of the alleged perjurer) at the time (he) (she) (took the oath) (made the affirmation).
(Additionally) (An) (Another) exception to the requirement that documentary evidence must be supported by corroborating evidence is when the document was written or furnished by (state the name of the alleged perjurer) or had in any way been recognized by (him) (her) as containing the truth at some time before the supposedly perjured statement was made.
If (this exception) (these exceptions) exist(s), the documentary evidence may be sufficient without corroboration to establish the falsity of the statement.
You may find the accused guilty of perjury only if you find that the documentary evidence (and credible corroborative evidence) establish(es) the falsity of the statement of (state the name of the alleged perjurer) beyond a reasonable doubt.
The fact that the accused and (state the name of the alleged perjurer) did not believe the statement to be true when it was (made) (subscribed) may be proved by testimony of one witness without corroboration or by circumstantial evidence, if the testimony or evidence convinces you beyond a reasonable doubt as to this element of the offense.