Article 126. Arson; burning property with intent to defraud · MCM ¶ 75
2024 Manual for Courts-Martial, United States
Recent revisions Summary of changesMaximum punishment
DD, TF, 25 years, E-1. (Category 3)
Sample specification
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board—location), on or about __________, willfully and maliciously (burn) (set on fire) an inhabited dwelling, to wit: (a house) (an apartment) (__________).
Elements
(1) That (state the time and place alleged), the accused (burned) (set on fire) an inhabited dwelling, that is: (state the inhabited dwelling alleged); and
(2) That the act was willful and malicious.
Definitions & other instructions
An act is done “willfully” if done intentionally or on purpose.
An act is done “maliciously” if done deliberately for some mischievous purpose and without legal justification or excuse. The malice required for this offense does not have to amount to ill will or hostility. It is sufficient if a person deliberately and without legal justification or excuse burns or sets fire to the inhabited dwelling.
There is no requirement that the accused specifically intend to set fire to or burn the dwelling alleged in the specification. To satisfy the elements of this offense, the accused need only willfully and maliciously start the fire that resulted in the burning or charring of the dwelling alleged.
“Inhabited dwelling” means the structure must be used for habitation, not that a human being must be present therein at the time the dwelling is burned or set on fire. It includes the outbuildings that form part of the cluster of buildings used as a residence. (A shop or store is not an inhabited dwelling unless occupied as such, nor is a house that has never been occupied or which has been temporarily abandoned.)
(A person may be found guilty of burning their own dwelling, whether they are an owner or tenant of said dwelling).
(Proof that the dwelling was consumed or materially injured is not required to establish the offense. It is sufficient if any part of the dwelling is burned or charred.) (A mere scorching or discoloration caused by heat is not sufficient.)
References
US v. Acevedo-Velez, 17 MJ 1 (CMA 1983); US v. Caldwell, 17 MJ 8 (CMA 1983); US v. DeSha, 23 MJ 66 (CMA 1986); US v. Banta, 26 MJ 109 (CMA 1988); US v. Crutcher, 49 MJ 236 (CAAF 1998).
Maximum punishment
DD, TF, 25 years, E-1. (Category 3)
Sample specification
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board—location), on or about __________, willfully and maliciously (burn) (set on fire), knowing that a human being was therein at the time, (the Post Theater) (__________).
Elements
(1) That (state the time and place alleged), the accused (burned) (set on fire) a certain structure, that is: (state the structure alleged);
(2) That the act was willful and malicious;
(3) That there was a human being in the structure at the time; and
(4) That the accused knew that there was a human being other than the accused (or (his) (her) confederates) in the structure at the time.
Definitions & other instructions
An act is done “willfully” if done intentionally or on purpose.
An act is done “maliciously” if done deliberately for some mischievous purpose and without legal justification or excuse. The malice required for this offense does not have to amount to ill will or hostility. It is sufficient if a person deliberately and without legal justification or excuse burns or sets fire to the structure.
A “structure” is any structure, other than an “inhabited dwelling,” movable or immovable, such as a theater, house of worship, boat, trailer, tent, auditorium, or any other sort of shelter or building, whether public or private.
(Knowledge that a human being is inside the structure may be proved by circumstantial evidence. For example, evidence that a store or theatre was set on fire during hours of business may be circumstantial evidence from which you may infer that the person who set the fire knew a human being was inside the structure. The drawing of this inference is not required.)
There is no requirement that the accused specifically intend to set fire to or burn the structure alleged in the specification. To satisfy the first and second elements of this offense, the accused need only willfully and maliciously start the fire that resulted in the burning or charring of the structure alleged.
(Proof that the structure was destroyed or seriously damaged is not required to establish the offense. It is sufficient if any part of the structure is burned or charred. A mere scorching or discoloration caused by heat is not sufficient.)
References
US v. Acevedo-Velez, 17 MJ 1 (CMA 1983); US v. Caldwell, 17 MJ 8 (CMA 1983); US v. DeSha, 23 MJ 66 (CMA 1986); US v. Banta, 26 MJ 109 (CMA 1988); US v. Crutcher, 49 MJ 236 (CAAF 1998).
Maximum punishment
(1) $1000 or less: DD, TF, 5 years, E-1. (Category 1)
(2) Over $1000: DD, TF, 10 years, E-1. (Category 2)
Sample specification
In that __________ (personal jurisdiction data), did, (at/on board—location), on or about __________, willfully and maliciously (burn) (set fire to) (an automobile) (__________), (of some value) (of a value of more than $1000) the property of another.
Elements
(1) That (state the time and place alleged), the accused (burned) (set fire to) certain property, that is: (state the property alleged), the property of another; (and)
(2) That the act was willful and malicious; [and]
[(3)] That the property was of a value of more than $1000.
Definitions & other instructions
An act is done “willfully” if done intentionally or on purpose.
An act is done “maliciously” if done deliberately for some mischievous purpose and without legal justification or excuse. The malice required for this offense does not have to amount to ill will or hostility. It is sufficient if a person deliberately and without legal justification or excuse burns or sets fire to the property of another.
“Property” means real or personal property of someone other than the accused.
There is no requirement that the accused specifically intend to set fire to or burn the property alleged in the specification. To satisfy the first and second elements of this offense, the accused need only willfully and maliciously start the fire that resulted in the burning or charring of the property of another alleged.
(Proof that the property was destroyed or seriously damaged is not required to establish the offense. It is sufficient if any part of the property is burned or charred. A mere scorching or discoloration caused by heat is not sufficient.)
References
US v. Acevedo-Velez, 17 MJ 1 (CMA 1983); US v. Caldwell, 17 MJ 8 (CMA 1983); US v. DeSha, 23 MJ 66 (CMA 1986); US v. Banta, 26 MJ 109 (CMA 1988); US v. Crutcher, 49 MJ 236 (CAAF 1998).
Maximum punishment
DD, TF, 10 years, E-1. (Category 2)
Sample specification
In that __________(personal jurisdiction data), did (at/on board—location), on or about __________, willfully and maliciously (burn) (set fire to) (a dwelling) (a barn) (an automobile) (________), with intent to defraud (the insurer thereof, to wit: __________) (__________).
Elements
(1) That (state the time and place alleged), the accused (burned) (set fire to) certain property, that is: (state the property alleged);
(2) That the act was willful and malicious; and
(3) That such (burning) (setting on fire) was with the intent to defraud (state the name of the person or organization alleged).
Definitions & other instructions
An act is done “willfully” if it is done intentionally or on purpose.
“Maliciously” means deliberately and without justification or excuse. The malice required for the offense does not have to amount to ill will or hostility. It is sufficient if a person deliberately and without justification or excuse burns or sets fire to property with intent to defraud another.
“Intent to defraud” means an intent to obtain an article or thing of value through a misrepresentation and to apply it to one’s own use and benefit or to the use and benefit of another, either temporarily or permanently.